<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu&#8217;s New &#8220;Light&#8221; Style Defaults to Dark Theme?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starryhope.com/linux/2010/ubuntus-new-light-style-defaults-to-dark-theme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starryhope.com/linux/2010/ubuntus-new-light-style-defaults-to-dark-theme/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.starryhope.com/linux/2010/ubuntus-new-light-style-defaults-to-dark-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-3937</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starryhope.com/?p=763#comment-3937</guid>
		<description>hideous....i stumbled across http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4824/24v4fuv.jpg which looks a billion times more appealing than http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4824/24v4fuv.jpg.

its the red tint thats really doing it for me, along with the horizontal bar across some menu&#039;s, like firefox navigation.

and on my pc the display is at 1024*768 which is MASSIVE, i have to do horizontal scrolling on some pages and right click menu takes up 1/5 of the page

although, im only testing it, i would usually use a widescreen and change the settings from default. Why on earth the ubuntu team think this theme will compete with windows is beyond me (mac users are staying put)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hideous&#8230;.i stumbled across <a href="http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4824/24v4fuv.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4824/24v4fuv.jpg</a> which looks a billion times more appealing than <a href="http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4824/24v4fuv.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4824/24v4fuv.jpg</a>.</p>
<p>its the red tint thats really doing it for me, along with the horizontal bar across some menu&#8217;s, like firefox navigation.</p>
<p>and on my pc the display is at 1024*768 which is MASSIVE, i have to do horizontal scrolling on some pages and right click menu takes up 1/5 of the page</p>
<p>although, im only testing it, i would usually use a widescreen and change the settings from default. Why on earth the ubuntu team think this theme will compete with windows is beyond me (mac users are staying put)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bas-r</title>
		<link>http://www.starryhope.com/linux/2010/ubuntus-new-light-style-defaults-to-dark-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>bas-r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starryhope.com/?p=763#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>Since I have contrast problems with my vision, I cannot see well on a black/dark background. First thing I did was change it to the light (the Real Light that is) theme to be actually able to read the menu&#039;s.
The swapping of the menu buttons was probably done to give it a bigger appeal to Mac users, (and the purple resembles one of OSX&#039;s default backgrounds), but for me, a former Windows user converted to Linux years ago, it is the biggest pain in the neck ever. After changing the colours I changed the menu buttons back to how they used to be. 
With those two modifications, the new look and feel of Ubuntu is a very modern and professional one. I like it. Font is great as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I have contrast problems with my vision, I cannot see well on a black/dark background. First thing I did was change it to the light (the Real Light that is) theme to be actually able to read the menu&#8217;s.<br />
The swapping of the menu buttons was probably done to give it a bigger appeal to Mac users, (and the purple resembles one of OSX&#8217;s default backgrounds), but for me, a former Windows user converted to Linux years ago, it is the biggest pain in the neck ever. After changing the colours I changed the menu buttons back to how they used to be.<br />
With those two modifications, the new look and feel of Ubuntu is a very modern and professional one. I like it. Font is great as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.starryhope.com/linux/2010/ubuntus-new-light-style-defaults-to-dark-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-3326</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starryhope.com/?p=763#comment-3326</guid>
		<description>Looks amateurish, don&#039;t like it (Of course, I&#039;ve tried it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks amateurish, don&#8217;t like it (Of course, I&#8217;ve tried it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.starryhope.com/linux/2010/ubuntus-new-light-style-defaults-to-dark-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-3311</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starryhope.com/?p=763#comment-3311</guid>
		<description>I agree it looks half-baked- But I read somewhere (Wherever it was) that the theme was not final, and I&#039;m quite sure it isn&#039;t. I&#039;m hoping that they will take some time to really look over the theme and get the bad stuff out before the release, and there&#039;s always 10.10 of course. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it looks half-baked- But I read somewhere (Wherever it was) that the theme was not final, and I&#8217;m quite sure it isn&#8217;t. I&#8217;m hoping that they will take some time to really look over the theme and get the bad stuff out before the release, and there&#8217;s always 10.10 of course. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
