<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Tip: Spellcheck (almost) Everything!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starryhope.com/tech/2005/mac-tip-spellcheck-almost-everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starryhope.com/tech/2005/mac-tip-spellcheck-almost-everything/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:21:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Huss&#8217; blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spell-checking belongs in the browser, not on the website</title>
		<link>http://www.starryhope.com/tech/2005/mac-tip-spellcheck-almost-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Huss&#8217; blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spell-checking belongs in the browser, not on the website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starryhope.com/?p=37#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t think spell-checking really belongs on websites because good spell-checking requires significant personalization that must be tailored to the end user based on their areas of interest and domains of expertise. For example, I want to tell my spellchecker to ignore springmvc, webwork, mysql, postgres, etc&#8230; Given most people don&#8217;t run browser based spellcheckers at the moment it&#8217;s still a good idea to have one built into your site but I hope that need goes away eventually. The most popular options at the moment seem to be using the built-in feature in Safari, the Google toolbar has a spellchecker, Spellbound for Firefox, or finally IESpell for IE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t think spell-checking really belongs on websites because good spell-checking requires significant personalization that must be tailored to the end user based on their areas of interest and domains of expertise. For example, I want to tell my spellchecker to ignore springmvc, webwork, mysql, postgres, etc&#8230; Given most people don&#8217;t run browser based spellcheckers at the moment it&#8217;s still a good idea to have one built into your site but I hope that need goes away eventually. The most popular options at the moment seem to be using the built-in feature in Safari, the Google toolbar has a spellchecker, Spellbound for Firefox, or finally IESpell for IE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
