ASUS Chromebox 3

Starry Hope Rating
2.5

Updated on

Photo of ASUS Chromebox 3

Note: The ASUS Chromebox 3 has been discontinued and is no longer available for purchase new. Chrome OS updates ended in June 2024. This page remains as a historical reference for existing owners.

The ASUS Chromebox 3 delivered a compact desktop Chrome OS experience when it launched in 2018. Available in configurations ranging from the budget-friendly Celeron 3865U to more capable Core i3 and i5 variants, this small-form-factor desktop appealed to businesses, schools, and home users seeking a simplified computing platform. While the device reached its end-of-life in June 2024, it still serves existing owners well for basic web browsing and cloud-based workflows.

ASUS Chromebox 3 Comparison Chart

ASUS Chromebox 3

ASUS Chromebox 3

ASUS Chromebox 3

ASUS Chromebox 3

ASUS Chromebox 3

ASUS Chromebox 3

ASUS Chromebox 3

ASUS Chromebox 3

Price

List Price: $749.99

Amazon Prices:

Check Price on Amazon

List Price: $549.99

Amazon Prices:

Check Price on Amazon

List Price: $249.99

Amazon Prices:

Check Price on Amazon

List Price: $449.99

Amazon Prices:

Check Price on Amazon

Model numberN020UN019UN017UN018U
Perfomance Rating4.04.02.62.6
Chromebook PlusNoNoNoNo
ProcessorDual-core 1.80 Ghz
Intel Celeron 3865U
Dual-core 1.80 Ghz
Intel Celeron 3865U
Dual-core 1.80 Ghz
Intel Celeron 3865U
Dual-core 1.80 Ghz
Intel Celeron 3865U
RAM8 GB8 GB4 GB4 GB
Internal Storage32 GB SSD32 GB SSD32 GB SSD32 GB SSD
Screen SizeNo ScreenNo ScreenNo ScreenNo Screen
Screen ResolutionNo ScreenNo ScreenNo ScreenNo Screen
Screen TypeNo ScreenNo ScreenNo ScreenNo Screen
Touch ScreenNoNoNoNo
Stylus / PenNo Stylus SupportNo Stylus SupportNo Stylus SupportNo Stylus Support
Dimensions
width x length x thickness
5.8 x 5.88 x 1.58 inches
(147.32 x 149.35 x 40.13 mm)
5.8 x 5.88 x 1.58 inches
(147.32 x 149.35 x 40.13 mm)
5.8 x 5.88 x 1.58 inches
(147.32 x 149.35 x 40.13 mm)
5.8 x 5.88 x 1.58 inches
(147.32 x 149.35 x 40.13 mm)
Weight2.2 lbs (1 kg)2.2 lbs (1 kg)2.2 lbs (1 kg)2.2 lbs (1 kg)
Backlit KeyboardNoNoNoNo
WebcamNo WebcamNo WebcamNo WebcamNo Webcam
WiFi802.11 b/g/n/ac802.11 b/g/n/ac802.11 b/g/n/ac802.11 b/g/n/ac
BluetoothBluetooth 4.2Bluetooth 4.2Bluetooth 4.2Bluetooth 4.2
EthernetYesYesYesYes
Cellular ModemNoNoNoNo
HDMIFull-Size HDMIFull-Size HDMIFull-Size HDMIFull-Size HDMI
USB Ports2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3, 1 USB-C
(with DisplayPort over USB Type-C)
2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3, 1 USB-C
(with DisplayPort over USB Type-C)
2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3, 1 USB-C
(with DisplayPort over USB Type-C)
2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3, 1 USB-C
(with DisplayPort over USB Type-C)
Thunderbolt PortsNoNoNoNo
Card ReadermicroSD / microSD SDXC / microSD SDHCmicroSD / microSD SDXC / microSD SDHCmicroSD / microSD SDXC / microSD SDHCmicroSD / microSD SDXC / microSD SDHC
BatteryNo BatteryNo BatteryNo BatteryNo Battery
Battery Life0.0 hours0.0 hours0.0 hours0.0 hours
FanlessNoNoNoNo
Auto Update
Expiration Date
June, 2024June, 2024June, 2024June, 2024

Related Chromebooks

Specifications and Performance

The ASUS Chromebox 3 packed reasonable connectivity into a 5.8 x 5.88 x 1.58-inch chassis weighing about 2.2 pounds. The port selection includes three USB 3.1 ports, two USB 2.0 ports, one USB-C port with DisplayPort output, full-size HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, and a microSD card slot supporting up to 256GB cards. Wi-Fi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.2 handle wireless duties. The device supports 4K displays through its video outputs, making it suitable for modern monitor setups.

The base Celeron 3865U configuration came with 4GB of DDR4 RAM and 32GB SSD storage—adequate for Chrome OS but modest by any measure. ASUS offered upgrade paths up to Core i7 processors with 16GB RAM, though reviewers questioned the value proposition of high-end Chrome OS configurations. Tim Danton at The Big Tech Question tested power consumption and found impressive efficiency: the device averaged around 5 watts during typical use, translating to roughly £4.50 annually in electricity costs. “Quiet operation and minuscule electricity costs” made it attractive for always-on applications.

ProsCons
Compact form factor with VESA mounting supportChrome OS updates ended June 2024
Extensive port selection including USB-C, HDMI, EthernetAndroid app compatibility was inconsistent
Silent operation and minimal power consumptionCeleron model felt sluggish compared to modern devices
4K display supportLimited 32GB base storage
Supports up to 256GB microSD expansionHigher-spec models offered questionable value
Device-independent cloud computingWeb-only workflow required browser workarounds

Reviewer Insights

Trusted Reviews

Chris Barraclough at Trusted Reviews awarded the Chromebox 3 three out of five stars, appreciating its compact size and strong connectivity while noting platform limitations for desktop use. “The device remained cool during use with next to no noise produced,” he observed during testing. However, he encountered frustrating app compatibility issues: “Spotify’s login screen refused to display properly,” requiring a browser workaround. His verdict captured the device’s niche appeal: it delivers a simplified desktop experience but has notable limitations for desk-bound use. He particularly questioned the existence of high-end configurations: “I have no idea why anyone would need a Chromebox 3 with a Core i7 chipset and 16GB of memory, considering the limitations of Chrome OS.”

The Big Tech Question

Tim Danton at The Big Tech Question conducted a thorough one-week test using the Chromebox 3 as his primary system. He praised the cloud-centric workflow, noting that years of Google Drive documents were “instantly accessible” and that if the hardware failed, “Asus could send me a new one the following day and I could pick up from exactly where I was.” At £250 for the base Celeron model, he found excellent value with minimal ongoing costs.

However, significant workflow limitations emerged during extended use. “Laggy is a more fitting description,” he wrote of the Celeron model, “and if you’re used to a Windows PC where Chrome windows launch in an instant, you’ll find the Chromebox 3 irritating at first; even the mouse seems a little sluggish.” He documented Android app issues—Outlook wouldn’t install, and Slack “rejected the device” entirely. File management between cloud services required tedious manual download-and-upload cycles. His conclusion was nuanced: the Chromebox 3 works best as a supplementary device for specific use cases rather than a complete Windows replacement.

Who Was This For?

The ASUS Chromebox 3 found its audience among users who understood Chrome OS’s strengths and limitations. Schools deployed it in computer labs where students needed browser access to educational platforms. Small businesses used it for point-of-sale kiosks, digital signage, and reception desk terminals. Home users appreciated it as a secondary computer for web browsing, email, and streaming media. Some even explored music production on Chrome OS using web-based DAWs, taking advantage of the desktop’s reliable power supply and USB ports for audio interfaces.

The Celeron model made sense for basic tasks—web browsing, Google Workspace applications, and lightweight Android apps. Users with heavier multitasking needs benefited from the Core i3 or i5 configurations, though the price premium pushed into territory where platform limitations became more significant. The VESA mounting capability allowed clean setups behind monitors, and the silent operation suited bedroom or living room installations.

Historical Context

The Chromebox 3 arrived during a transitional period for Chrome OS. Android app support had just arrived on desktop Chrome, but as reviewers documented, compatibility remained inconsistent. Linux container support was emerging but not yet mature. The platform worked best for users who lived primarily in the browser—those who relied on web applications, Google’s productivity suite, and cloud storage.

With Chrome OS updates ending in June 2024, the Chromebox 3 is now officially unsupported. Existing units continue to function but no longer receive security patches or feature updates. Owners considering continued use should weigh security implications, particularly for sensitive activities like online banking. For offline tasks, media playback, or isolated computing needs, the hardware remains capable despite its discontinued status.